Towards a holistic appreciation of the meaning of athletic injury and recovery

David J. Savage

University College Chester, Chester (UK)

Abstract
Injury can be a traumatic experience for some athletes in a psychological as well as physiological sense. There is substantial evidence that confirms the possible negative nature of injury experi-ence. This paper is an interim report of an ongoing project aimed at deepening the understanding of injury experience. In it rich, in-depth, holistic information is gathered in a planned, systematic and extensive manner relating to the experience of being injured and the strategies used to cope with it. Such detailed information is not available in the extant literature. The general approach taken in this research project is called a representative case-study. It has involved in the order of 24 hours of co-investigation with a single international athlete. A range of information gathering techniques were used in the project including investigative interviewing, re-vivification and a rep-ertory grid. This combination of methods enabled detailed narrative accounts of the injury experi-ence and coping strategies to emerge and a more abstract description of events at the level of per-sonal constructs. This report will focus primarily on the repertory grid information. The grid itself concerns events across time which occur in the period from the injury event itself to the athlete's return to the full athletic involvement. A progressive phases model of injury experience incorpo-rating functional and dysfunctional coping strategies and intervention possibilities will be pre-sented, which the grid data gives initial support, as does collation of previous research. The re-flections of the athlete (co-investigator) are presented which confirm that the non-invasive infor-mation collection strategies used in this research project can in themselves constitute an appropri-ate therapeutic intervention strategy with injured athletes. They facilitate effective review and learning from the injury experience. Suggestions for further model development are made.

Back to Berlin Abstracts